Central Ideas and Details - Complete Interactive Lesson
Part 1: Evidence-Based Reading
Reading Comprehension: Main Idea & Central Theme
Part 1 of 7 — Finding the Central Idea
Every SAT Reading passage—whether literary, social science, or natural science—will test whether you can identify the central idea or main purpose.
How to Identify the Central Idea
- Read the first and last sentences of the passage carefully—they usually frame the argument
- Ask: "What is the author trying to convince me of, or what point are they making?"
- Eliminate answers that are too narrow (only about one detail) or too broad (beyond what the passage discusses)
Common Main Idea Question Stems
- "Which choice best states the main idea of the passage?"
- "The primary purpose of this passage is to..."
- "The passage is mainly concerned with..."
Example Passage
Recent studies suggest that bilingual children develop stronger executive function skills than their monolingual peers. Researchers at Georgetown University found that bilinguals showed enhanced ability to switch between tasks, filter out irrelevant information, and maintain focus—skills collectively known as cognitive flexibility.
Main idea: Bilingualism in children is associated with stronger executive function/cognitive flexibility.
SAT Trap ⚠️
Wrong answers often restate a supporting detail as if it were the main idea. If an answer choice mentions a specific study finding without connecting it to the broader argument, it's probably a trap.
Main Idea Practice 🎯
Deep Dive: Main Idea Mastery
Worked Example 1: Testing Each Answer Choice
Passage summary: "Research shows screen time before bed disrupts melatonin production, worsening sleep quality. However, screen type matters — e-readers on night mode had minimal effect."
| Answer Choice | Verdict | Why |
|---|---|---|
| A) "All screen time is harmful" | ❌ Too extreme | Passage says some screens have minimal effect |
| B) "Screen time's effect on sleep depends on screen type and settings" | ✅ Correct | Captures the nuance: not all screens are equal |
| C) "E-readers are better than phones" | ❌ Too narrow | Just one detail, not the main idea |
| D) "Melatonin production is complex" | ❌ Too broad | Passage is about screens and sleep, not melatonin in general |
Worked Example 2: The One-Sentence Summary Method
| Passage Topic | After Reading, You Think… | One-Sentence Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Wolves in Yellowstone | "Wolves changed the whole ecosystem" | "Reintroducing apex predators triggers cascading ecological benefits" |
| Urban farming | "City gardens help communities" | "Urban agriculture improves food access and community cohesion" |
| Bilingual education | "Being bilingual helps your brain" | "Bilingualism enhances cognitive flexibility and executive function" |
Now match your summary to the answer choices. The best match = correct answer.
Main Idea vs. Supporting Detail
| Statement | Main Idea or Detail? |
|---|---|
| "Urban green spaces improve mental health" | Main idea (broad claim) |
| "A 2023 study of 500 participants found 20% lower anxiety" | Detail (specific evidence) |
| "Parks reduce stress and increase social interaction" | Main idea (captures scope) |
| "Central Park spans 843 acres" | Detail (single fact) |
Red Flags in Wrong Answers
- Too extreme: "completely disproves," "the only cause," "all scientists agree"
- Too narrow: Focuses on one paragraph instead of the whole passage
- Reversed logic: States the opposite of the author's argument
- Out of scope: Introduces ideas not discussed in the passage
Advanced Main Idea Challenge 🎯
Main Idea Check — Select the correct answer.
Part 1 Summary
| Skill | Strategy |
|---|---|
| Find the main idea | One-sentence summary, then match |
| Eliminate wrong answers | Too broad, too narrow, too extreme, reversed logic |
| Distinguish detail from main idea | Details are specific; main ideas are broad claims |
| Watch for traps | "Proves," "always," "the only" = usually wrong |
Next: Command of Evidence — Textual →
Part 2: Main Idea & Purpose
Command of Evidence: Textual
Part 2 of 7 — Finding Evidence in the Text
"Command of Evidence" questions ask you to identify which part of a passage supports a given claim or conclusion. These are among the most common SAT Reading question types.
Two Main Types
Type 1: "Which choice provides the best evidence for the answer to the previous question?"
- These are paired with another question
- Strategy: Answer the first question, THEN find the quote that supports your answer
Type 2: "Which quotation from the passage most effectively illustrates the claim?"
- You're given a claim and must find the matching evidence
- Strategy: Read each quote and ask "Does this directly support the stated claim?"
The Evidence Must Be DIRECT
The correct quote must directly support the claim—not just be related to the same topic.
Claim: "The author suggests that early childhood education has long-term economic benefits."
| Quote | Verdict |
|---|---|
| "Children who attended preschool earned 25% more by age 40" | ✅ Direct economic evidence |
| "Early education fosters social development" | ❌ Related topic, but not about economics |
| "The program cost $8,000 per student" | ❌ About cost, not about benefits |
SAT Trap ⚠️
Trap answers are quotes that mention the same topic as the claim but don't actually support it. Just because a quote discusses the same subject doesn't mean it's evidence for the specific claim.
Evidence Identification Practice 🎯
Deep Dive: Evidence Matching Mastery
Worked Example 1: Direct vs. Indirect Evidence
Claim: "Exercise improves academic performance."
| Quote | Direct or Indirect? | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| "Students who exercised daily scored 15% higher on math tests" | Direct — links exercise to scores | ✅ Best evidence |
| "Exercise increases blood flow to the brain" | Indirect — mechanism, not academic outcome | ❌ Related, but not direct evidence |
| "Many students enjoy playing sports after school" | Neither — about enjoyment, not performance | ❌ Same topic, wrong focus |
| "High-performing students tend to have better sleep habits" | Neither — about sleep, not exercise | ❌ Different variable entirely |
Worked Example 2: Paired Evidence Question Strategy
| Step | Action |
|---|---|
| 1. Read Q1 | "The author suggests that remote work increases productivity. Which claim does the passage support?" |
| 2. Answer Q1 from passage | Your answer: "Remote workers complete 13% more tasks per day" |
| 3. Read Q2 | "Which quote best supports the answer to Q1?" |
| 4. Match | Find the quote that mentions remote workers and task completion |
| 5. Result | The quote about "13% more tasks" directly supports your Q1 answer ✅ |
Evidence Evaluation Checklist
| Ask yourself ↓ | If YES | If NO |
|---|---|---|
| Does the quote mention the specific topic of the claim? | Keep considering | Eliminate ❌ |
| Does it SUPPORT the claim (not just relate to it)? | Keep considering | Eliminate ❌ |
| Is the support DIRECT (data, clear statement)? | ✅ Strong candidate | Check others |
| Could it support a DIFFERENT claim instead? | Eliminate ❌ | ✅ Match confirmed |
Advanced Evidence Challenge 🎯
Evidence Matching Check — Select the correct answer.
Part 2 Summary
| Strategy | Detail |
|---|---|
| Evidence must be | DIRECT support for the SPECIFIC claim |
| Biggest trap | Same topic, wrong claim |
| Paired questions | Answer Q1 first → find matching quote |
| Elimination | Does it mention the claim's topic? Does it support or just relate? |
Next: Inference & Implied Meaning →
Part 3: Inference Questions
Inference & Implied Meaning
Part 3 of 7 — Reading Between the Lines
Inference questions ask you to determine what the passage implies or suggests without directly stating. These require careful attention to tone, word choice, and logical connections.
Inference vs. Speculation
- Valid inference: A conclusion logically supported by evidence in the passage
- Speculation: A guess that goes beyond what the passage supports
Rule: If you can point to specific words or sentences that support your inference, it's valid. If you're imagining scenarios the author didn't address, it's speculation.
Common Inference Question Stems
- "It can be inferred from the passage that..."
- "The author most likely believes that..."
- "The passage suggests that..."
- "Based on the passage, it is reasonable to conclude that..."
Example
Dr. Chen spent fourteen years developing the vaccine, working through three failed clinical trials before the fourth showed promising results. When asked about her persistence, she simply said, "The problem was worth solving."
We can infer:
- ✅ Dr. Chen is dedicated to her research (evidence: 14 years, persisted through failures)
- ✅ She is motivated by the importance of the work, not just personal success (evidence: "The problem was worth solving")
- ❌ She was the only person working on this vaccine (not stated or implied)
- ❌ The vaccine is now widely available (we only know trial 4 was promising)
Inference Practice 🎯
Deep Dive: Inference vs. Speculation
Worked Example 1: Testing Whether an Inference Is Valid
Passage: "After decades of decline, the bald eagle population in the continental United States rebounded from 417 nesting pairs in 1963 to over 71,400 in 2020, largely attributed to the ban on DDT pesticides and federal habitat protections."
| Proposed Inference | Valid? | Text Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental policy can successfully reverse species decline | ✅ Yes | DDT ban + habitat protections → population rebound |
| DDT was the sole cause of eagle decline | ❌ No | "Largely attributed" ≠ "sole cause" |
| All bird species have recovered similarly | ❌ No | Only discusses eagles |
| Conservation efforts require government intervention | ✅ Borderline | Federal protections helped, but passage doesn't say they're required |
Worked Example 2: Tone-Based Inference
Passage: "The committee's proposal, though well-intentioned, overlooks the economic realities that small business owners face daily."
| Inference | Valid? | Clue |
|---|---|---|
| The author has concerns about the proposal | ✅ Yes | "Overlooks" = criticism |
| The author thinks the committee is dishonest | ❌ No | "Well-intentioned" acknowledges good faith |
| The author prioritizes economic concerns | ✅ Yes | "Economic realities" is the objection |
| The author opposes all committee proposals | ❌ No | Only about THIS proposal |
Inference Strength Scale
| Language | Strength | SAT Likelihood |
|---|---|---|
| "The passage proves…" | Too strong | ❌ Almost always wrong |
| "The passage establishes…" | Strong | Sometimes correct |
| "The passage suggests…" | Moderate | ✅ Usually correct |
| "It can be inferred…" | Moderate | ✅ Standard inference Q |
| "The passage hints…" | Weak | Acceptable if supported |
Advanced Inference Challenge 🎯
Inference Check — Select the correct answer.
Part 3 Summary
| Concept | Key Rule |
|---|---|
| Valid inference | Must be supported by SPECIFIC text |
| Speculation | Goes beyond what text supports — always wrong |
| "Proves" / "definitely" | Too strong for SAT — usually wrong |
| "Suggests" / "implies" | ✅ Standard SAT inference language |
| Tone-based inference | Word choice reveals author's attitude |
Next: Vocabulary in Context →
Part 4: Vocabulary in Context
Vocabulary in Context
Part 4 of 7 — Word Meaning from Context
The SAT tests "words in context"—you need to determine which meaning of a word fits the passage, NOT just the most common definition.
Strategy: Substitution Method
- Read the sentence with the target word
- Cover the word and predict what should go there
- Check which answer choice matches your prediction
Example
"The company decided to table the proposal until the next quarterly meeting."
The word "table" most nearly means:
- A) a piece of furniture ❌
- B) postpone ✅
- C) present for discussion ❌ (British English meaning—less common in SAT context)
- D) organize into rows ❌
Multiple-Meaning Words the SAT Loves
| Word | Common Meaning | SAT Contextual Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Acute | sharp, severe | perceptive, keen |
| Check | verify | restrain, limit |
| Arrest | detain by police | stop, halt (progress) |
| Qualify | become eligible | limit, moderate (a statement) |
| Gravity | force of attraction | seriousness, importance |
| Champion | winner | advocate for, support |
| Craft | art project | skill, careful construction |
| Provincial | from a province | narrow-minded, unsophisticated |
SAT Trap ⚠️
The most obvious definition is almost always wrong. If "table" is in the answer choices and one option is "a flat surface for eating," that's the trap. The SAT wants the secondary or contextual meaning.
Vocabulary in Context Practice 🎯
Deep Dive: Vocabulary in Context Mastery
Worked Example 1: The Substitution Method Step-by-Step
| Step | Action |
|---|---|
| Sentence | "The new regulations effectively checked the company's rapid expansion into foreign markets." |
| Cover the word | "The new regulations effectively _____ the company's rapid expansion…" |
| Predict | "limited" or "restrained" or "slowed" |
| Choices | A) verified B) examined C) restrained D) marked |
| Match | C) restrained matches "limited/slowed" ✅ |
| Trap | A) verified — the most common meaning of "check" |
Worked Example 2: Multiple-Meaning Words in Action
| Word | Common Meaning | SAT Meaning | Context Clue |
|---|---|---|---|
| "The discovery arrested the decline" | Detained (police) | Stopped, halted | "Decline" → something being stopped |
| "She qualified her support" | Became eligible | Limited, added conditions to | "Qualified" modifying "support" |
| "The gravity of the situation" | Physical force | Seriousness | "Of the situation" → not physics |
| "He championed the cause" | Won a competition | Advocated for | "The cause" → advocacy context |
Top 20 SAT Multiple-Meaning Words
| Word | Trap Definition | SAT Definition |
|---|---|---|
| Table | Furniture | Postpone |
| Arrest | Detain | Halt/stop |
| Check | Verify | Restrain |
| Qualify | Meet requirements | Limit/restrict |
| Gravity | Physical force | Seriousness |
| Champion | Winner | Advocate |
| Craft | Arts and crafts | Skill/expertise |
| Provincial | From a province | Narrow-minded |
| Pedestrian | Walker | Ordinary/dull |
| Temper | Anger | Moderate/soften |
| Cultivate | Farm | Develop/nurture |
| Resolve | Solve | Determination |
| Appreciate | Be grateful | Increase in value |
| Telling | Narrating | Revealing/significant |
| Singular | One | Remarkable/unique |
Advanced Vocabulary Challenge 🎯
Vocabulary in Context Check — Select the SAT meaning.
Part 4 Summary
| Strategy | Detail |
|---|---|
| Substitution method | Cover word → predict → match |
| #1 trap | The most common definition is usually wrong |
| Multiple-meaning words | SAT tests secondary/contextual meanings |
| Key words to know | Table, arrest, check, qualify, gravity, champion, craft, temper |
| Context clues | Surrounding words reveal the intended meaning |
Next: Purpose & Rhetoric →
Part 5: Command of Evidence
Purpose & Rhetoric
Part 5 of 7 — Why Did the Author Write This?
Purpose questions test your ability to understand not just WHAT the author says, but WHY they structured the passage the way they did.
Author's Purpose Categories
| Purpose | Signal Words | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Argue/Persuade | "should," "must," "critical that" | "Schools should require financial literacy courses" |
| Inform/Explain | "researchers found," "data shows" | "A 2024 study revealed that bees navigate using Earth's magnetic field" |
| Analyze/Evaluate | "however," "on the other hand," "while" | "While the policy reduced crime, it disproportionately affected minority communities" |
| Narrate | descriptive language, chronological | "Maria opened the letter with trembling hands" |
| Compare/Contrast | "unlike," "similarly," "whereas" | "Unlike previous telescopes, JWST can detect infrared light" |
Function of a Specific Paragraph/Sentence
Some questions ask: "The author includes the anecdote in lines 15-20 primarily to..."
Common functions:
- Provide a concrete example of an abstract concept
- Introduce a counterargument before refuting it
- Establish the author's credibility or emotional connection
- Transition between two main ideas
- Anticipate and address a potential objection
Example
"Skeptics argue that renewable energy cannot reliably power a modern grid. However, a 2024 analysis of Germany's Energiewende program shows that wind and solar provided 52% of the nation's electricity with fewer blackouts than the previous decade."
Purpose of the first sentence: To introduce a counterargument (the skeptics' view) that the author will then refute with evidence.
Purpose & Rhetoric Practice 🎯
Deep Dive: Purpose & Rhetoric Analysis
Worked Example 1: Identifying Paragraph Function
Paragraph sequence in a passage about space exploration:
| Paragraph | Content | Function |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | "Space exploration has long captured human imagination…" | Introduces the topic and sets context |
| 2 | "However, critics argue that the billions spent on space could address problems on Earth" | Presents counterargument |
| 3 | "This objection, while understandable, overlooks the tangible benefits…" | Refutes the counterargument |
| 4 | "For instance, satellite technology now provides GPS, weather forecasting…" | Provides evidence (concrete examples) |
| 5 | "As privatization of space accelerates, these benefits will only multiply" | Concludes with forward-looking significance |
Worked Example 2: Rhetorical Moves and Their Purpose
| Text | The Author Is Doing | Why |
|---|---|---|
| "Consider the case of Dr. Sarah Chen, who spent 14 years…" | Using an anecdote | To humanize an abstract argument |
| "While some researchers suggest X, others contend Y" | Framing a debate | To show complexity / balanced view |
| "The statistics are striking: a 400% increase since 2010" | Citing data | To provide quantitative evidence |
| "Can we really afford to ignore this trend?" | Asking a rhetorical question | To engage the reader and imply "no" |
Common "Purpose" Answer Patterns
| Purpose Phrasing | Usually Correct When |
|---|---|
| "To provide an example of…" | Paragraph follows a general claim |
| "To introduce a counterargument" | Paragraph starts with "Critics argue" or "Some suggest" |
| "To qualify a previous claim" | Paragraph adds nuance like "however" or "although" |
| "To establish the significance of" | Paragraph explains why the topic matters |
| "To transition between" | Paragraph shifts from one subtopic to another |
Advanced Purpose Challenge 🎯
Purpose & Rhetoric Check — Select the correct answer.
Part 5 Summary
| Concept | Key Rule |
|---|---|
| Author's purpose | Argue, inform, analyze, narrate, or compare |
| Paragraph function | Introduce, counter, refute, evidence, or conclude |
| "Some argue" | = counterargument incoming |
| Anecdotes | Humanize abstract arguments |
| Rhetorical questions | Imply the author's answer |
| "For example" | = evidence for the preceding claim |
Next: Data Interpretation in Reading →
Part 6: Problem-Solving Workshop
Data Interpretation in Reading
Part 6 of 7 — Charts, Graphs, and Tables in R&W
The Digital SAT includes informational graphics alongside some Reading & Writing passages. You must integrate data from both the text and the visual.
Common Graphic Types
- Bar charts: Compare quantities across categories
- Line graphs: Show trends over time
- Tables: Present precise numerical data
- Scatter plots: Show relationships between two variables
Strategy: Text + Graphic Integration
- Read the passage first to understand the main argument
- Examine the graphic: title, axes, labels, units
- Ask: "How does this graphic support or complicate the passage's claims?"
Example Question Pattern
Passage says: "Renewable energy adoption has accelerated dramatically in the past decade."
Graph shows: Solar installation growing from 2 GW in 2010 to 150 GW in 2023.
Question: "Which claim from the passage is best supported by the data in the figure?"
✅ Answer: The claim about dramatic acceleration—the graph shows 75x growth.
SAT Trap ⚠️
- Don't confuse what the text claims with what the data shows. Sometimes the data actually contradicts or qualifies the text's claims.
- Always check the scale and units on graphs. A graph that looks dramatic might only show a change from 50.0% to 50.5%.
Data + Reading Integration 🎯
Deep Dive: Text + Data Integration
Worked Example 1: Does the Data Support or Complicate the Text?
Text claim: "Electric vehicle sales have surged, suggesting widespread consumer adoption."
Graph data: EV sales grew from 1% to 8% of total car sales (2018-2024).
| Analysis | Result |
|---|---|
| Did sales grow? | Yes — 1% to 8% is 8× growth |
| Does "surge" fit? | ✅ Yes — 8× growth qualifies as a surge |
| Does "widespread adoption" fit? | ⚠️ Questionable — 8% is still a small minority |
| Verdict | Data PARTIALLY supports: "surged" ✅ but "widespread" may overstate 8% share |
Worked Example 2: Reading Graph Details Carefully
| Graph Element | What to Check | Common Mistake |
|---|---|---|
| Y-axis | Does it start at 0? | A graph starting at 50 exaggerates changes |
| Scale | Linear or logarithmic? | Log scale makes exponential growth look linear |
| Units | %, absolute numbers, per capita? | 50% increase FROM 2 = only 3 |
| Time range | What years are shown? | Trend in 2020-2024 may differ from 2000-2024 |
| Title | What does it actually measure? | "Revenue" ≠ "profit" ≠ "units sold" |
Data-Text Relationship Types
| Relationship | Signal | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Data supports text | "As the graph shows…" | Text says "rising" + graph shows increase |
| Data qualifies text | "However, the data suggests…" | Text says "dramatic" but change is small |
| Data contradicts text | "Contrary to the claim…" | Text says "decline" but graph shows increase |
| Data extends text | "Furthermore, the data reveals…" | Text discusses cause, data shows magnitude |
Data Interpretation Challenge 🎯
Data + Reading Check — Select the correct answer.
Part 6 Summary
| Concept | Key Rule |
|---|---|
| Integration | Read text first → examine graph → compare |
| Check graph | Y-axis, scale, units, title, time range |
| Data can | Support, qualify, contradict, or extend the text |
| Truncated y-axis | Exaggerates visual differences |
| Common trap | Text uses strong language but data shows small change |
Next: Reading Comprehension Review →
Part 7: Review & Applications
Reading Comprehension Review
Part 7 of 7 — Comprehensive Review & Test Strategy
Quick-Reference Decision Tree
When you see a Reading question:
- "Main idea" or "primary purpose" → Summarize passage in one sentence, match to answer
- "Best evidence" or "which quote" → Find the DIRECT support, not just related topic
- "Infer" or "suggests" → Must be supported by specific text, not outside knowledge
- "Word in context" → Cover the word, predict a synonym, match to choices
- "Purpose of paragraph/sentence" → Ask WHY the author included it (counter? example? transition?)
- "Data/graphic" → Integrate text claims with visual evidence; watch for overstatement
Time Management for Reading
- Budget: ~1.2 minutes per question (R&W module: 27 questions, 32 minutes)
- Don't read the whole passage first on the Digital SAT—each question comes with its own short passage
- Read the question stem first to know what to look for
- If a question is taking more than 2 minutes, flag it and move on
Most Common Mistakes
| Mistake | Fix |
|---|---|
| Choosing an answer that "sounds smart" but isn't supported | Always point to specific text evidence |
| Overthinking inference questions | The correct inference is usually straightforward |
| Picking the most common word definition | Context determines meaning, not familiarity |
| Not reading all four choices | The best answer might be D—compare all options |
| Bringing in outside knowledge | Only what's in the passage counts |
Comprehensive Review Quiz 🎯
Deep Dive: Reading Comprehension Master Review
Worked Example 1: Multi-Skill Question
Passage: "The prevailing theory held that dinosaurs were cold-blooded reptiles, sluggish and dependent on external heat. However, recent bone structure analyses suggest many species maintained high metabolic rates consistent with warm-bloodedness."
| Question Type | Question | Answer |
|---|---|---|
| Main idea | What does the passage suggest? | New evidence challenges the cold-blooded dinosaur theory |
| Vocabulary | "Prevailing" most nearly means… | Widely accepted/dominant |
| Inference | The author implies that… | The traditional view may be incorrect |
| Purpose | "However" in sentence 2 serves to… | Introduce evidence that challenges the previous claim |
| Evidence | Which supports the new theory? | "Bone analyses suggest high metabolic rates" |
Worked Example 2: Quick Classification
| Question Stem | Type | Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| "The main idea of the passage is…" | Main Idea | One-sentence summary → match |
| "Which quote best supports…" | Evidence | Direct support for the specific claim |
| "It can be inferred that…" | Inference | Text evidence only — no speculation |
| "As used in line 5, X means…" | Vocabulary | Cover → predict → substitute |
| "The author includes the anecdote to…" | Purpose | Ask WHY, not WHAT |
| "The graph suggests that…" | Data | Check scale, units, then integrate |
The SAT Reading Scoring Zones
| Score Range | What You Need |
|---|---|
| 350-450 | Get main idea and basic vocab right |
| 450-550 | + Evidence matching and basic inference |
| 550-650 | + Purpose, tone analysis, data integration |
| 650-750 | + Nuanced inferences, qualified answers |
| 750-800 | + Recognize subtle traps, manage time perfectly |
Reading Comprehension Final Challenge 🎯
Reading Evidence Final Check — Select the correct answer.
Full Topic Summary: Reading Evidence
| Part | Topic | Core Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Main Idea | One-sentence summary → match |
| 2 | Command of Evidence | DIRECT support for the SPECIFIC claim |
| 3 | Inference | Must be text-supported, not speculation |
| 4 | Vocabulary in Context | Cover → predict → substitute (not common def) |
| 5 | Purpose & Rhetoric | Ask WHY the author included it |
| 6 | Data Interpretation | Check scale/units → integrate with text |
| 7 | Review | Question first → passage → predict → eliminate |
The 5 Golden Rules of SAT Reading
- Question first — know what you're looking for
- Predict before checking choices — avoid traps
- Text evidence only — no outside knowledge
- "Proves" / "always" = usually wrong — SAT hedges
- Same topic ≠ same claim — evidence must be DIRECT
🎉 Reading Evidence complete!