Loadingโฆ
Select appropriate transition words and phrases, improve passage organization, and ensure logical flow between sentences and paragraphs.
Learn step-by-step with practice exercises built right in.
The SAT tests your ability to:
Furthermore, Moreover, In addition, Also, Similarly, Likewise, Additionally
However, Nevertheless, On the other hand, In contrast, Conversely, Although, Despite, Yet, Still, Nonetheless
Therefore, Consequently, As a result, Thus, Hence, Accordingly, Because of this, For this reason
First, Second, Next, Then, Finally, Subsequently, Meanwhile, Previously, Afterward, Initially
For example, For instance, Specifically, In particular, To illustrate, Namely
In conclusion, In summary, Overall, Ultimately, To sum up, In short
Indeed, In fact, Certainly, Importantly, Notably
Choose the best transition: "The study found that exercise improves mood. __________, regular physical activity can reduce the risk of depression." (A) However (B) Furthermore (C) Instead (D) Nevertheless
Step 1: What's the relationship?
These sentences are ADDING similar ideas โ both are benefits of exercise.
Step 2: Match the transition: (A) "However" = contrast โ these sentences don't contrast โ (B) "Furthermore" = addition โ perfect! Adding another benefit โ (C) "Instead" = replacement โ sentence 2 doesn't replace sentence 1 โ (D) "Nevertheless" = contrast โ no contrast here โ
Answer:
Review key concepts with our flashcard system
Explore more SAT Prep topics
Read the sentence BEFORE and the sentence AFTER the transition. What's the logical relationship?
| Relationship | Transition |
|---|---|
| Sentence 2 adds to Sentence 1 | Furthermore, Moreover, Additionally |
| Sentence 2 contrasts Sentence 1 | However, In contrast, Nevertheless |
| Sentence 2 is caused by Sentence 1 | Therefore, As a result, Consequently |
| Sentence 2 gives an example | For example, For instance |
| Sentence 2 is next in sequence | Next, Then, Subsequently |
Read the sentences with the transition. Does the logical flow make sense?
"To make this paragraph most logical, sentence 3 should be placed..."
"Should the writer add/keep this sentence?"
Tip: If both sentences point in the same direction (same argument, additional support), use an addition transition.
Choose the best transition: "The city invested millions in a new transit system. __________, ridership has remained below projections for three consecutive years." (A) Therefore (B) Similarly (C) Nevertheless (D) For example
Step 1: What's the relationship?
This is a CONTRAST โ the big investment hasn't led to expected results.
Step 2: Match the transition: (A) "Therefore" = cause/effect โ This implies ridership SHOULD be low because they invested, which is wrong โ (B) "Similarly" = addition โ These ideas aren't similar โ (C) "Nevertheless" = contrast โ โ Despite the big investment, results are disappointing (D) "For example" = illustration โ Sentence 2 isn't an example of sentence 1 โ
Answer: (C) Nevertheless
"Nevertheless" vs. "However": Both show contrast. "Nevertheless" emphasizes that something is true DESPITE what was said before. "However" is a more general contrast.
Should this sentence be added before sentence 4?
Sentence to add: "This technique was first developed in Japan in the 1950s."
Paragraph context: Discusses a modern manufacturing process, sentence 3 introduces the technique, sentence 4 describes how it works today.
(A) Yes, because it provides historical context. (B) Yes, because it explains how the technique works. (C) No, because it interrupts the flow from introduction to explanation. (D) No, because it contradicts the passage.
Analyze the placement:
The paragraph flow is:
Does the sentence fit here?
(A) "provides historical context" โ True, but is this the right PLACE for it? Between introduction and explanation, it could interrupt the flow.
(B) "explains how the technique works" โ No, it gives history, not explanation. โ
(C) "interrupts the flow from introduction to explanation" โ โ The reader expects to learn HOW it works after the introduction, not a historical tangent.
(D) "contradicts the passage" โ Nothing contradictory about stating when it was developed. โ
Answer: (C) โ While the information is relevant, placing it between the introduction and explanation disrupts the logical flow. It might fit better in a separate paragraph about the technique's history.
SAT Key: A sentence can be TRUE and RELEVANT but still be in the WRONG place. Always consider flow.
Reorder these sentences for the most logical paragraph: [1] "Today, solar panel efficiency has reached 22%." [2] "In 1954, Bell Labs created the first practical solar cell with 6% efficiency." [3] "Solar energy technology has advanced dramatically over the past seven decades." [4] "Researchers predict efficiency could exceed 30% within the next decade."
Step 1: Identify the topic sentence: [3] "Solar energy technology has advanced dramatically..." โ This is the broadest, most general statement. It introduces the paragraph's main idea.
Step 2: Find the chronological order for supporting details: [2] "In 1954..." โ Starting point (earliest time) [1] "Today..." โ Current status [4] "Researchers predict..." โ Future projection
Logical order: [3], [2], [1], [4]
Reading it through: "Solar energy technology has advanced dramatically over the past seven decades. In 1954, Bell Labs created the first practical solar cell with 6% efficiency. Today, solar panel efficiency has reached 22%. Researchers predict efficiency could exceed 30% within the next decade."
โ Topic sentence โ historical start โ present โ future
Why this works:
Answer: [3], [2], [1], [4]
In a five-sentence paragraph, sentence 3 reads: "This phenomenon, which scientists call the 'observer effect,' has been demonstrated in numerous experiments." Where should this sentence be placed if sentence 1 introduces quantum mechanics, sentence 2 describes particles, sentence 4 describes a 1998 experiment, and sentence 5 concludes the paragraph?
Analyze the clues in sentence 3:
Check the current position (as sentence 3):
Flow: Introduction (1) โ Phenomenon description (2) โ Name and general claim (3) โ Specific example (4) โ Conclusion (5)
Answer: Sentence 3 should STAY where it is (position 3). It correctly:
Strategy used: