Command of Evidence

Find textual evidence to support answers

Command of Evidence (SAT Reading)

What Are Evidence Questions?

Two-part question format:

  1. First question: Answer about passage (main idea, inference, etc.)
  2. Second question: "Which choice provides the best evidence for the answer to the previous question?"

The Strategy

Work BACKWARDS!

Don't answer Question 1 first!

Better approach:

  1. Read Question 1 (but don't answer yet)
  2. Look at Evidence Question 2 - read all 4 line citations
  3. Find which lines best answer Question 1
  4. That becomes your answer to Question 1
  5. Then select those lines for Question 2

Why? The evidence choices LIMIT your options for Question 1!

Types of Evidence Questions

Type 1: Direct Support

Answer is directly stated in cited lines

Question 1: "What was the main finding?" Evidence: Lines that explicitly state the finding

Look for: Clear, direct statement

Type 2: Inference Support

Lines provide information to make inference

Question 1: "What can be inferred about...?" Evidence: Lines that contain clues for the inference

Look for: Information that logically leads to conclusion

Type 3: Support for Opinion/Claim

Lines back up author's perspective

Question 1: "The author suggests that...?" Evidence: Lines showing author's viewpoint

Look for: Author's commentary, not just facts

How to Evaluate Evidence

Good Evidence:

Directly relates to the question ✓ Clearly supports the answer ✓ Specific (not vague) ✓ Complete (not missing key info)

Bad Evidence:

Off-topic (about something else) ✗ Weak connection to answer ✗ Too general (doesn't prove the point) ✗ Incomplete (only partial support)

The Paired Questions Strategy

Step-by-Step:

1. Read Question 1 carefully

  • Understand what it's asking
  • Don't answer yet!

2. Go to Question 2 (Evidence)

  • Read all four line references
  • Understand what each one says

3. Eliminate weak evidence

  • Cross out irrelevant lines
  • Cross out vague/incomplete support

4. Match evidence to Q1 answers

  • Which evidence supports which answer?
  • Usually 1-to-1 pairing

5. Choose best evidence

  • Select strongest, most direct support

6. Answer Question 1

  • Choose answer that matches your evidence

7. Answer Question 2

  • Select the evidence you identified

Common Traps

Trap 1: Mentions Same Topic ≠ Evidence

Just because lines mention the topic doesn't mean they answer the question!

Example:

  • Question: "What caused the decline?"
  • Bad evidence: "The decline was significant." (mentions decline but no cause!)
  • Good evidence: "Pollution led to the decline." (states cause!)

Trap 2: Partial Evidence

Lines that only partially support the answer

Look for: Complete, full support

Trap 3: True But Irrelevant

Statement is true but doesn't answer THIS question

Always check: Does this DIRECTLY answer what's asked?

Trap 4: Too General

Vague statements that could mean anything

Better: Specific, concrete evidence

What Makes Strong Evidence?

Specificity

Concrete details > vague statements

Weak: "It was important." Strong: "This discovery revolutionized medicine."

Directness

Directly states or clearly implies the answer

Weak: "Many factors were involved." Strong: "Temperature was the primary factor."

Completeness

Contains all parts needed to support answer

Incomplete: "The study found effects." Complete: "The study found significant positive effects on learning."

Relevance

Directly relates to question asked

Irrelevant: Interesting but off-topic Relevant: On-point for this specific question

SAT Evidence Question Patterns

Pattern 1: Cause and Effect

Q1: What caused X? Evidence: Must state the cause

Pattern 2: Main Idea

Q1: What is the main point? Evidence: Lines expressing central idea (usually has opinion/claim)

Pattern 3: Author's Attitude

Q1: How does author feel? Evidence: Lines with evaluative language (positive/negative words)

Pattern 4: Support for Claim

Q1: What supports the claim? Evidence: Facts, data, examples backing up the claim

Pattern 5: Definition/Explanation

Q1: What does author mean by X? Evidence: Lines that define or explain X

How to Practice

Read Each Evidence Choice

Don't just skim - actually read the lines!

Ask: "Does This Answer the Question?"

Be specific - WHICH part answers WHICH part of question?

Look for Key Words

Words that directly relate to question

Test Each Pairing

Evidence A with Answer 1, Evidence B with Answer 2, etc.

Eliminate

Cross out clearly wrong evidence first

Time-Saving Strategies

Don't Read All Four Citations Fully

Skim first, then read closely only promising ones

Start with Extreme Answers

Very specific or very general - often easier to eliminate

Look for Transition Words

"However," "Therefore," "Because" - signal important points

Check Line Numbers

Are they from different parts of passage? Might indicate different topics

SAT Tips

  • Work BACKWARDS - start with evidence question
  • Read all 4 evidence choices before answering Q1
  • Direct support beats partial support
  • Specific beats vague
  • On-topic is essential - interesting ≠ relevant
  • Match evidence to answer choices for Q1
  • Eliminate weak evidence first (off-topic, incomplete)
  • "Best evidence" = most direct, complete, relevant
  • Don't just match keywords - need actual support
  • Complete thought needed, not fragment
  • 1-to-1 pairing usually exists (Evidence A → Answer 1)
  • Trust the text - answer must be supported by actual lines

📚 Practice Problems

1Problem 1easy

Question:

Passage excerpt: (Lines 10-12) "The experiment was conducted over six months." (Lines 22-24) "The results showed a 40% improvement in test scores." (Lines 35-37) "Researchers attributed the improvement to the new teaching method." (Lines 48-50) "Future studies will explore other factors."

Question 1: What did researchers conclude caused the improvement? Question 2: Which lines provide the best evidence?

A) Lines 10-12 B) Lines 22-24 C) Lines 35-37 D) Lines 48-50

💡 Show Solution

Solution:

Question asked: What caused the improvement?

Evaluate each evidence choice:

A) Lines 10-12: "six months" → just timeline, no cause ✗

B) Lines 22-24: "40% improvement" → states result, not cause ✗

C) Lines 35-37: "attributed improvement to new teaching method" → DIRECTLY states cause! ✓

D) Lines 48-50: "future studies" → not about current conclusion ✗

Answer to Q1: New teaching method caused improvement Answer to Q2: C) Lines 35-37

SAT Tip: Look for words like "attributed to," "caused by," "due to" - they signal cause!

2Problem 2medium

Question:

Question 1: The author suggests that social media has had what effect on communication?

Evidence choices: A) "Social media platforms have millions of users worldwide." B) "People now communicate more frequently but with less depth than before." C) "The first social network was created in the 1990s." D) "Privacy concerns have increased in recent years."

Which choice provides the best evidence?

💡 Show Solution

Solution:

Question: Effect of social media on communication

Evaluate evidence:

A) "millions of users"

  • About popularity, not effect on communication ✗

B) "more frequently but with less depth"

  • Directly describes HOW communication changed ✓
  • Specific effect: frequency up, depth down

C) "created in 1990s"

  • Historical fact, not effect ✗

D) "Privacy concerns increased"

  • About privacy, not communication quality ✗

Answer: B

Why B is best:

  • Directly answers "what effect"
  • Specific about how communication changed
  • On-topic (communication, not just general social media)

SAT Tip: Match the evidence to the SPECIFIC question - "effect on communication" needs evidence about communication changing!

3Problem 3hard

Question:

Question 1: The passage suggests that the scientist's discovery was significant because it:

A) Was unexpected B) Led to practical applications
C) Challenged existing theories D) Won awards

Evidence choices: A) "The finding surprised the research community." B) "This breakthrough enabled development of new medical treatments." C) "The discovery contradicted prevailing scientific assumptions." D) "She received international recognition for her work."

Which pairing is correct?

💡 Show Solution

Solution:

Strategy: Match each evidence to corresponding answer

Test pairings:

Answer A (Unexpected) + Evidence A ("surprised") ✓ Match!

Answer B (Practical applications) + Evidence B ("enabled new treatments") ✓ Match!

Answer C (Challenged theories) + Evidence C ("contradicted assumptions") ✓ Match!

Answer D (Awards) + Evidence D ("international recognition") ✓ Match!

All pair correctly - so which is BEST?

Key word in question: "significant because"

Need evidence showing WHY it was important:

  • A: Surprising = interesting, but not necessarily significant
  • B: New treatments = PRACTICAL IMPACT = significance! ✓
  • C: Contradicted theories = important for science, but less direct
  • D: Awards = recognition, but that's a result, not why it's significant

Answer: B + Evidence B

Why: Practical applications (medical treatments) show real-world significance, not just academic interest.

SAT Tip: When all pairs match, choose evidence showing IMPACT or CONSEQUENCE, not just description!