Process of Elimination
Eliminate wrong answers effectively
Process of Elimination (POE)
Why Process of Elimination Matters
Key SAT fact: There is NO guessing penalty
- Correct answer: +1 point
- Wrong answer: 0 points
- Blank: 0 points
Therefore: ALWAYS guess! Even if you have no idea.
But with Process of Elimination, you can often get it right even when you don't know the answer.
The POE Strategy
Step 1: Eliminate the Obviously Wrong
Look for answers that are:
- Factually incorrect
- Contradict the passage/problem
- Use extreme language ("always," "never," "only")
- Impossible based on the data
Example (Reading):
Question: The author's tone is best described as...
A) Hostile and aggressive
B) Thoughtful and analytical
C) Completely neutral
D) Wildly enthusiastic
POE: If the passage discusses pros and cons calmly → Eliminate A and D (too extreme), probably C too (likely has SOME perspective). Choose B.
Step 2: Use Partial Knowledge
Even if you don't know the full answer, you might know:
- What it's NOT
- A constraint it must meet
- One part of a multi-step problem
Example (Math):
Question: If and , what is ?
A) 16
B) 8
C) 4
D) -4
POE:
- A is wrong (16² = 256, not 16)
- B is wrong (8² = 64, not 16)
- C is wrong (problem says , so must be negative)
- D must be correct ✓
Step 3: Check Reasonableness
Eliminate answers that:
- Don't make sense in context
- Are way too big or too small
- Have wrong units
- Violate basic rules
Example (Word Problem):
A car travels 60 miles in 2 hours. What is its average speed?
A) 0.033 mph
B) 2 mph
C) 30 mph
D) 120 mph
POE: A and B are way too slow for a car. D seems too fast (60 miles in 2 hours). Must be C.
Subject-Specific POE Strategies
Reading POE
Eliminate if the answer:
❌ Goes too far (passage says "suggests," answer says "proves")
❌ Contradicts stated facts
❌ Uses words NOT in the passage (for vocabulary questions)
❌ Is too narrow (doesn't cover whole passage) or too broad (includes things not discussed)
For "main idea" questions:
- Eliminate answers about minor details
- Eliminate answers too general (could apply to any passage)
For "evidence" questions:
- Must directly support the previous answer
- Eliminate if it talks about something else
Writing POE
Eliminate if it:
❌ Is grammatically incorrect
❌ Changes the meaning
❌ Is wordy when a concise option exists
❌ Has unclear pronoun references
❌ Creates run-on sentences or fragments
Quick checks:
- Subject-verb agreement
- Verb tense consistency
- Pronoun-antecedent agreement
- Parallel structure
Math POE
Eliminate if it:
❌ Doesn't answer what's asked (question asks for , answer gives )
❌ Results from a common mistake (forgetting negative sign, dropping exponent)
❌ Fails a quick substitution check
❌ Violates constraints (e.g., negative when must be positive)
Strategy: Plug in answer choices
For "solve for x" questions, test each answer:
Example:
A) 2
B) 4
C) 8
D) 16
Test A: ✗
Test B: ✓ (STOP, found it!)
Advanced POE: When Down to Two
When you've eliminated to 2 choices:
Reread Carefully
- Look for subtle differences
- Check exact wording in passage/problem
- See which matches more precisely
Look for Trap Answers
SAT includes "partial" correct answers:
- Right idea, wrong application
- Correct for different question
- Mixes up cause and effect
Example:
Passage says: "The invention, though innovative, was too expensive for widespread adoption."
Question: Why wasn't the invention adopted?
A) It wasn't innovative
B) It cost too much
POE: A contradicts the passage. B is correct (even though the passage mentions innovation, that's not WHY it wasn't adopted).
Trust Patterns
After eliminating, if both seem possible:
- Avoid extreme language
- Pick the more specific one (for reading)
- Pick the simpler calculation (for math)
- Choose active voice over passive (for writing)
Common POE Mistakes
❌ Eliminating too quickly — read all choices first
❌ Not committing — if you eliminate, REALLY eliminate (don't second-guess without reason)
❌ Ignoring gut feeling — if something "feels wrong," there's often a reason
❌ Choosing first answer that sounds okay — compare ALL before deciding
❌ Not physically marking — cross out eliminated answers on test booklet
POE in Action
Mental checklist for each answer:
- ☐ Is this factually correct?
- ☐ Does this match the question asked?
- ☐ Is this reasonable/logical?
- ☐ Does this match the passage/data given?
- ☐ Is this better than other remaining choices?
Time-Saving POE
When short on time:
- Read the question
- Predict the answer (if possible)
- If your prediction matches a choice → pick it
- If not → eliminate obviously wrong answers
- Guess from remaining choices
Remember: Eliminating even ONE wrong answer increases your odds significantly:
- 4 choices: 25% chance
- 3 choices: 33% chance
- 2 choices: 50% chance
- 1 choice: 100% chance!
The POE Mindset
Think like this:
"I might not know the right answer, but I can definitely spot wrong answers."
Approach each answer asking: "Can I eliminate this?" (not "Is this correct?")
Why this works:
- Less pressure
- Uses partial knowledge
- Often easier to spot wrong than to know right
- Increases confidence even when uncertain
Practice Drill
For your next practice test:
- Before looking at choices: Try to predict answer
- Read all 4 choices
- Physically cross out eliminated choices
- Make note: How many did you eliminate?
- Track: Did eliminating help?
Goal: Get comfortable eliminating 1-2 choices on EVERY question where you're not 100% confident.
📚 Practice Problems
1Problem 1easy
❓ Question:
In the sentence "The committee members was discussing the new policy," you need to identify the error. Using process of elimination, which answers can you eliminate immediately?
A) NO CHANGE B) change "committee" to "committees" C) change "was" to "were" D) change "policy" to "policies"
Which can you eliminate first?
💡 Show Solution
Process of Elimination strategy: Remove OBVIOUSLY WRONG answers first.
Identify the error: • Subject: "committee members" (plural) • Verb: "was" (singular) • ERROR: Subject-verb disagreement
Eliminating answers:
A) NO CHANGE • Keeps the error (was with plural subject) • Possible wrong answer, but could be trick • Don't eliminate yet ⏸️
B) change "committee" to "committees" • Makes subject "committees members" (awkward) • Doesn't fix verb agreement • ELIMINATE immediately ✗
C) change "was" to "were" • Makes verb plural to match subject • Fixes the error! • KEEP ✓
D) change "policy" to "policies" • "Policy" is object, not part of subject-verb agreement • Doesn't address the error • ELIMINATE immediately ✗
Answer: You can eliminate B and D immediately, leaving A vs. C.
Since there's an error, A is wrong, C is correct.
Elimination Strategy:
-
IDENTIFY THE ISSUE (grammar, math concept, etc.)
-
ELIMINATE OBVIOUSLY WRONG: • Changes unrelated parts • Creates new errors • Nonsensical
-
NARROW TO 2-3 CHOICES
-
EVALUATE REMAINING CAREFULLY
Benefits: • Improves odds (50% vs 25% if guessing) • Reduces cognitive load • Focuses attention on viable options • Faster decision-making
SAT Tip: Even eliminating ONE wrong answer significantly improves your odds!
2Problem 2medium
❓ Question:
On a math question asking "What is the value of x in 3x + 7 = 22?", the answers are:
A) 3 B) 5 C) 7 D) 15
You don't remember the exact steps. How can you use process of elimination?
What's the BEST elimination strategy?
💡 Show Solution
When stuck, use ANSWER CHOICES to your advantage!
Strategy 1: PLUG IN answers (backsolving)
Test A) x = 3: 3(3) + 7 = 9 + 7 = 16 ≠ 22 ✗ ELIMINATE A
Test B) x = 5: 3(5) + 7 = 15 + 7 = 22 ✓ This works! Answer: B
Strategy 2: ESTIMATION (before calculating)
3x + 7 = 22 3x = 15 (approximately, after subtracting 7) x = 5 (dividing by 3)
Eliminate: C) 7 → 3(7) + 7 = 28 (too big) ✗ D) 15 → 3(15) + 7 = 52 (way too big) ✗
Narrow to A or B, then test
Strategy 3: REASONABLENESS
22 - 7 = 15 15 ÷ 3 = 5
Answer: B) 5
Elimination Principles:
-
TOO LARGE/SMALL: • Quick estimation eliminates extreme values • In this case, C and D are clearly too large
-
DOESN'T FIT PATTERN: • If answer must be even/odd • If answer must be positive/negative • Eliminates incompatible choices
-
BACKSOLVING: • Plug answers into equation • Works great for equations and word problems • Start with middle value (B or C) if answers are ordered
-
PROCESS: • Eliminate 1-2 wrong answers • Test remaining • Confirm answer makes sense
BEST strategy for this problem: Backsolving (testing answer choices)
When to backsolvе: • Equation solving • Word problems with numerical answers • "Which value satisfies..." • When algebra feels too complicated
3Problem 3hard
❓ Question:
A Reading question asks: "The author's tone in the passage can best be described as:"
A) hostile and bitter B) cautiously optimistic C) completely neutral D) ecstatically joyful
You remember the passage was positive but measured. How do you use elimination effectively?
💡 Show Solution
For subjective questions (tone, attitude, purpose), eliminate EXTREME or UNSUPPORTED answers.
What you know: Passage was positive but measured (not extreme)
Eliminating:
A) "hostile and bitter" • EXTREME negative words • Passage was positive, not negative • ELIMINATE immediately ✗
B) "cautiously optimistic" • Positive (optimistic) ✓ • Measured (cautiously) ✓ • Fits description • KEEP ✓
C) "completely neutral" • "Completely" is extreme • Passage was positive, not neutral • ELIMINATE ✗
D) "ecstatically joyful" • EXTREME positive words • Passage was measured, not ecstatic • ELIMINATE ✗
Answer: B) cautiously optimistic
Elimination for Tone/Attitude Questions:
-
ELIMINATE EXTREMES: Extreme words (usually wrong): • Absolutely, completely, entirely, utterly • Ecstatic, furious, devastating, perfect • Always, never, all, none
SAT favors NUANCED answers: • Somewhat, slightly, generally, often • Cautiously, moderately, reasonably • Suggests, implies, tends to
-
ELIMINATE OPPOSITE TONE: • If passage is positive, eliminate negative • If passage is serious, eliminate humorous • If passage is critical, eliminate praising
-
LOOK FOR QUALIFIERS: • "Cautiously optimistic" better than "optimistic" • "Mildly critical" better than "harshly critical" • "Generally supportive" better than "completely supportive"
-
CONTEXT CLUES: • Strong adjectives (amazing, terrible) → not neutral • Hedging language (perhaps, may, seems) → tentative tone • Imperatives (must, should) → authoritative tone
Elimination Pattern for Reading:
1st Pass - ELIMINATE: • Opposite meaning • Extreme statements • Unsupported by passage • Too narrow or too broad
2nd Pass - COMPARE REMAINING: • Which has more passage support? • Which is more precise? • Which better matches scope?
3rd Pass - CONFIRM: • Reread relevant parts • Verify answer choice
General Elimination Wisdom:
SAT answer patterns: • Extreme answers usually wrong • "Always"/"Never" usually wrong • Middle-ground answers often correct • Answers with qualifiers often correct
When stuck between 2: • Reread relevant passage section • Look for subtle differences • Choose more specific/nuanced option • Trust your instinct (first impression often right)
Remember: Eliminating even ONE answer improves odds from 25% to 33%!
Practice with Flashcards
Review key concepts with our flashcard system
Browse All Topics
Explore other calculus topics