Loadingā¦
Understand types of mixtures, chromatography, distillation, and techniques for separating components based on physical properties.
Learn step-by-step with practice exercises built right in.
Mixture: Physical combination of two or more substances
Definition: Uniform composition throughout
Examples:
Particle size: Molecular level (< 1 nm)
Properties:
A student performs paper chromatography on a sample of black ink. After the solvent travels 10.0 cm up the paper, three colored spots are visible: a blue spot 8.0 cm from the origin, a red spot 5.0 cm from the origin, and a yellow spot 2.0 cm from the origin. (a) Calculate the Rf value for each pigment. (b) Which pigment is most polar? (c) If the student used a more polar solvent, how would the Rf values change?
Solution:
Given:
Find: (a) Rf values, (b) Most polar pigment, (c) Effect of more polar solvent
| Section | Format | Questions | Time | Weight | Calculator |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Multiple Choice | MCQ | 60 | 90 min | 50% | ā |
| Free Response (Long) | FRQ | 3 | 69 min | 30% | ā |
| Free Response (Short) | FRQ | 4 | 36 min | 20% | ā |
Avoid these 3 frequent errors
See how this math is used in the real world
mol of reacts with mol of . How many grams of water are produced? Which is the limiting reagent? ()
Review key concepts with our flashcard system
Explore more AP Chemistry topics
Definition: Non-uniform composition
Types:
1. Suspensions
Examples:
2. Colloids
Examples:
| Type | Particle Size | Settles? | Filterable? | Examples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution | < 1 nm | No | No | Salt water, air |
| Colloid | 1-1000 nm | No | No | Milk, fog |
| Suspension | > 1000 nm | Yes | Yes | Muddy water |
Definition: Scattering of light by colloidal particles
Observation:
Example:
Why it occurs:
Test for colloid:
General principle: Use differences in physical properties to separate components
Separates: Solid from liquid in suspension
Based on: Particle size
Method:
Examples:
Limitations:
Separates: Liquids with different boiling points
Based on: Boiling point differences
Simple Distillation:
Setup:
Process:
Best for: Large BP differences (> 25°C)
Examples:
Fractional Distillation:
For: Liquids with similar boiling points
Difference from simple:
Examples:
Separates: Components based on different affinities for mobile and stationary phases
Based on:
Two phases:
Stationary phase: Fixed material (paper, silica gel, column packing)
Mobile phase: Moving solvent that carries mixture
Types:
Setup:
How it works:
Result: Components separate into spots at different heights
Rf value (Retention factor):
Range: 0 < Rf < 1
Uses:
Example:
Similar to paper chromatography:
Advantages over paper:
Setup:
How it works:
Uses:
Large scale: Can purify grams to kilograms
For: Volatile compounds
Mobile phase: Inert gas (He, Nā) - carrier gas
Stationary phase: Liquid coating inside column
Process:
Output: Chromatogram (peaks at different retention times)
Uses:
Advantages:
Separates: Solid from impurities
Based on: Solubility differences with temperature
Process:
Why it works:
Example:
Separates: Components based on solubility in different solvents
Based on: "Like dissolves like" principle
Liquid-Liquid Extraction:
Setup:
Process:
Example:
Distribution coefficient (Kd):
Large Kd: Compound prefers organic layer
Separates: Dissolved solid from liquid
Based on: Volatility difference (liquid evaporates, solid doesn't)
Process:
Example:
Difference from distillation:
Separates: Liquid from settled solid
Process:
Simple but limited:
Example:
| Technique | Separates | Based on | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Filtration | Solid/liquid | Particle size | Sand from water |
| Distillation | Liquids | Boiling point | Water from salt water |
| Chromatography | Components | Polarity/affinity | Ink pigments |
| Crystallization | Pure solid | Solubility vs T | Purify sugar |
| Extraction | Components | Solubility | Caffeine from tea |
| Evaporation | Solid/liquid | Volatility | Salt from seawater |
| Decanting | Solid/liquid | Density/settling | Wine from sediment |
Paper/TLC chromatography:
Rf calculation:
Factors affecting Rf:
Polarity of compound:
Polarity of solvent:
Temperature: Affects solvent properties
Using Rf for identification:
Limitations:
Elution order:
Why?
Choosing solvent:
Multiple techniques combined:
Fractional distillation of crude oil:
| Fraction | BP Range (°C) | Uses |
|---|---|---|
| Gas | < 20 | LPG, fuel |
| Gasoline | 20-200 | Car fuel |
| Kerosene | 200-300 | Jet fuel |
| Diesel | 300-370 | Diesel fuel |
| Lubricating oil | 370-500 | Motor oil |
| Residue | > 500 | Asphalt, tar |
Process:
Gas chromatography applications:
Paper chromatography:
1. Mixtures vs. Pure Substances:
2. Physical vs. Chemical Separation:
3. Choosing Separation Method:
4. Polarity is Key:
5. Scale Matters:
Part (a): Calculate Rf values
Rf (Retention factor) formula:
For blue pigment:
For red pigment:
For yellow pigment:
Answer (a):
Summary table:
| Pigment | Distance (cm) | Rf value |
|---|---|---|
| Blue | 8.0 | 0.80 |
| Red | 5.0 | 0.50 |
| Yellow | 2.0 | 0.20 |
Part (b): Which pigment is most polar?
Principle of paper chromatography:
Paper = stationary phase (polar cellulose) Solvent = mobile phase
How polarity affects Rf:
Polar compounds:
Nonpolar compounds:
Relationship:
Comparing our pigments:
| Pigment | Rf | Polarity |
|---|---|---|
| Blue | 0.80 (highest) | Least polar |
| Red | 0.50 (middle) | Intermediate polarity |
| Yellow | 0.20 (lowest) | Most polar |
Answer (b):
Explanation:
Part (c): Effect of more polar solvent
Current situation:
If solvent becomes MORE polar:
Effect on pigment behavior:
More polar solvent better dissolves polar pigments
All pigments carried farther up paper
All Rf values INCREASE
Specific predictions:
Yellow (most polar):
Red (intermediate):
Blue (least polar):
Answer (c):
Reasoning:
Visual representation:
Current (less polar solvent):
With more polar solvent:
Note: Spots still in same order (blue > red > yellow), but all higher
Additional insights:
Why does order stay the same?
Practical implications:
Too polar solvent:
Too nonpolar solvent:
Optimal solvent:
Summary of key concepts:
Rf = distance(component) / distance(solvent)
Lower Rf = more polar (for polar stationary phase)
More polar solvent ā higher Rf values
Chromatography separates by polarity
A mixture of ethanol (BP 78°C) and water (BP 100°C) is to be separated. (a) Which separation technique would be most appropriate and why? (b) During simple distillation, which component will distill over first? (c) Why can't pure ethanol (100%) be obtained by simple distillation of an ethanol-water mixture? (d) What additional technique could achieve better separation?
Solution:
Given:
Find: (a) Best separation technique, (b) Which distills first, (c) Why not 100% pure, (d) Better technique
Part (a): Most appropriate separation technique
Analysis of mixture:
Type: Two miscible liquids (form solution)
Key property difference: Boiling points
Best technique: DISTILLATION
Why distillation?
Liquids have different BPs
Components are miscible
Want to purify/collect both components
Answer (a):
Reason: Separates miscible liquids based on boiling point differences. Ethanol (lower BP) vaporizes first, travels to condenser, and is collected. Water (higher BP) remains in flask.
Part (b): Which component distills first?
Principle: Component with lower boiling point vaporizes first
Comparison:
During distillation:
Step 1: Heat mixture
Step 2: Vaporization
Step 3: Condensation
Answer (b):
Reason: Lower boiling point (78°C < 100°C). Component with lower BP is more volatile and evaporates first.
Part (c): Why can't 100% pure ethanol be obtained?
Key concept: Ethanol-water forms an AZEOTROPE
Azeotrope: Mixture that boils at constant temperature with constant composition
Ethanol-water azeotrope:
Why azeotrope forms:
Intermolecular forces:
H-bonding between ethanol and water:
These interactions:
Distillation behavior:
Starting with dilute ethanol (e.g., 10% ethanol):
But at 95.6% ethanol:
Answer (c):
\boxed{\text{Ethanol-water forms an azeotrope at 95.6% ethanol}}
Explanation: At this composition, liquid and vapor have identical composition. Further distillation cannot increase purity beyond 95.6%. Strong hydrogen bonding between ethanol and water creates this constant-boiling mixture.
Part (d): Techniques for better separation
To get > 95.6% ethanol (absolute ethanol), use:
Method 1: Add drying agent
Chemical reaction:
Method 2: Azeotropic distillation
Method 3: Fractional distillation
For initial question (a) - should specify:
If BP difference is moderate (20-25°C):
Answer (d):
\boxed{\text{+ Drying agent (to break azeotrope and get 100% ethanol)}}
Fractional distillation advantages:
To get absolute ethanol (100%):
Summary comparison:
| Method | Can reach | How it works |
|---|---|---|
| Simple distillation | ~95.6% ethanol | BP difference, one vaporization |
| Fractional distillation | 95.6% ethanol | Multiple vaporization cycles, efficient |
| + Drying agent | 100% ethanol | Removes water chemically |
| Azeotropic distillation | 100% ethanol | Third component breaks original azeotrope |
Key concepts:
Choose separation by property difference
Lower BP ā distills first
Azeotropes limit distillation
Fractional > Simple distillation
Break azeotrope chemically
A student needs to separate a mixture containing sand (SiOā), salt (NaCl), and naphthalene (CāāHā, a nonpolar organic solid, sublimes at 80°C). Design a complete separation scheme to isolate each component in pure form. For each step, identify: (i) the technique used, (ii) the property exploited, (iii) what is separated from what. Draw a flow chart of your procedure.
Solution:
Given mixture components:
Objective: Separate and isolate ALL THREE components in pure form
Key properties to exploit:
| Component | Water soluble? | Sublimes? | Polarity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sand | No | No | Nonpolar |
| Salt | Yes | No | Ionic |
| Naphthalene | No | Yes (80°C) | Nonpolar |
SEPARATION SCHEME:
STEP 1: SUBLIMATION
(i) Technique: Sublimation
(ii) Property exploited: Naphthalene sublimes (solid ā gas directly) at 80°C; sand and salt do not sublime
(iii) What is separated: Naphthalene (collected) from sand + salt (remain)
Procedure:
Result after Step 1:
STEP 2: DISSOLUTION
(i) Technique: Dissolution / Extraction with water
(ii) Property exploited: Salt is soluble in water; sand is not
(iii) What is separated: Salt (dissolves) from sand (does not dissolve)
Procedure:
Result after Step 2:
STEP 3: FILTRATION
(i) Technique: Filtration
(ii) Property exploited: Particle size - sand particles too large to pass through filter
(iii) What is separated: Sand (trapped) from salt solution (passes through)
Procedure:
Result after Step 3:
STEP 4: DRYING SAND
(i) Technique: Drying / Evaporation
(ii) Property exploited: Water evaporates; sand does not
(iii) What is separated: Water (evaporates) from sand (remains)
Procedure:
Result after Step 4:
STEP 5: EVAPORATION / CRYSTALLIZATION
(i) Technique: Evaporation (or crystallization for better purity)
(ii) Property exploited: Water evaporates; salt does not (non-volatile)
(iii) What is separated: Water (evaporates) from salt (remains)
Procedure:
Method A - Evaporation (faster):
Method B - Crystallization (purer):
Result after Step 5:
COMPLETE FLOW CHART:
Step 1: SUBLIMATION (80°C)
Step 2: ADD WATER
Step 3: FILTRATION
Step 4: DRY SAND
Step 5: EVAPORATION
ALTERNATIVE SCHEME (Different order):
Could also start with dissolution:
But first scheme is better because:
DETAILED SUMMARY TABLE:
| Step | Technique | Property Used | Separated | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sublimation | Sublimes at 80°C | Naphthalene from (sand + salt) | Pure CāāHā |
| 2 | Dissolution | Water solubility | Salt dissolves, sand doesn't | Solution + solid |
| 3 | Filtration | Particle size | Sand from salt solution | Sand (wet) + filtrate |
| 4 |
KEY CONSIDERATIONS:
Order matters:
Temperature control:
Purity checks:
Common mistakes to avoid: ā Filtering before dissolving salt (would trap salt + sand together) ā Adding water before sublimation (naphthalene hard to remove when wet) ā Not drying sand properly (would have salt contamination from residual water)
ALTERNATIVE TECHNIQUES (if available):
Instead of sublimation, could use:
Advantage of sublimation over extraction:
FINAL ANSWER:
Complete separation scheme:
All three components isolated in pure form!
Key concepts applied:
| Drying |
| Volatility |
| Water from sand |
| Pure SiOā |
| 5 | Evaporation | Volatility | Water from salt | Pure NaCl |