Integration of Knowledge
Make comparisons and connections across texts
Integration of Knowledge (ACT Reading)
What is Integration of Knowledge?
Integration = Combining information from multiple sources or parts of a text
These questions test your ability to:
- Connect ideas across a passage
- Synthesize information from different sections
- Compare and contrast viewpoints
- Draw conclusions from combined evidence
Types of Integration Questions
1. Synthesizing Information
Synthesis = Putting together information from different parts
Question format: "Based on the passage, both X and Y:"
How to answer:
- Find where X is discussed
- Find where Y is discussed
- Identify what they have in common
- Choose answer supported by both sections
Example:
Paragraph 2 discusses benefits of solar energy (renewable, clean)
Paragraph 4 discusses benefits of wind energy (renewable, clean)
Question: "The passage indicates that both solar and wind energy are:"
Answer: "renewable and produce no pollution"
2. Connecting Concepts
Questions ask you to link related ideas
Question format: "The information in lines 20-25 supports the point made in lines 45-48 by:"
How to answer:
- Read both sections
- Identify the connection (example, evidence, illustration, contrast)
- Choose answer describing that relationship
Relationship types:
- Evidence: Second section proves first
- Example: Second section illustrates first
- Contrast: Second section opposes first
- Elaboration: Second section expands on first
3. Making Inferences Across Text
Unlike simple detail questions, these require connecting multiple pieces
Question format: "Based on information in the passage, it can reasonably be inferred that:"
How to answer:
- Check that answer is supported by passage evidence
- May require combining info from 2+ places
- Still close to text — not wild speculation!
Example:
Passage states:
- "Species A is found only in high-altitude environments"
- "Global warming is reducing high-altitude habitat"
Reasonable inference: "Species A is threatened by global warming"
4. Comparative Passages
Some ACT Reading sections have two short passages on same topic
Questions ask you to compare/contrast:
- Main ideas
- Authors' perspectives
- Evidence used
- Conclusions reached
Question format: "Unlike the author of Passage A, the author of Passage B:"
How to answer:
- Identify what Passage A says/does
- Identify what Passage B says/does
- Find the difference
- Choose answer reflecting that difference
Analyzing Arguments
Identifying Claims
Claim = Statement author wants you to believe
Usually:
- In introduction (thesis)
- In conclusion (main point)
- In topic sentences
Question format: "The author's main argument is that:"
How to answer:
- Find the central claim
- Eliminate supporting details
- Choose broadest answer that encompasses passage
Evaluating Evidence
Evidence = Facts, examples, data used to support claims
Question format: "Which of the following does the author use to support the claim that X?"
How to answer:
- Find where claim X is made
- Look at surrounding sentences for support
- Identify type of evidence (statistics, examples, expert opinion, etc.)
Types of evidence:
- Statistics/Data: Numbers, percentages
- Examples: Specific instances
- Expert testimony: Quotes from authorities
- Logical reasoning: Cause-effect, if-then
- Historical precedent: Past events
- Anecdotes: Personal stories
Recognizing Counterarguments
Counterargument = Opposing view that author addresses
Signal phrases:
- "Some argue that..."
- "Critics claim..."
- "However, opponents believe..."
- "On the other hand..."
Question format: "The author mentions the opposing view in order to:"
Common purposes:
- Acknowledge and then refute it
- Show complexity of issue
- Strengthen own argument by addressing criticism
- Present balanced perspective
Drawing Conclusions
Inference vs. Stated Fact
Stated fact: Directly written in passage
Inference: Logical conclusion based on passage evidence
Valid inference:
✓ Small logical step from text
✓ Supported by passage evidence
✓ Reasonable and likely
Invalid inference:
❌ Requires huge logical leap
❌ Not supported by evidence
❌ Based on outside knowledge
Question format:
"It can be reasonably inferred that:"
"The passage suggests that:"
How to answer:
- Find relevant passage section
- Ask: What logically follows from this information?
- Eliminate unsupported choices
- Choose best-supported inference
Applying Passage Ideas
Application questions ask you to extend passage concepts to new situations
Question format: "Based on the passage, which of the following situations would be most similar to X?"
How to answer:
- Understand X thoroughly
- Identify key characteristics
- Check each answer choice for those characteristics
- Choose best match
Example:
Passage describes mutualism: relationship where both species benefit
Question: "Which is most similar to mutualism?"
Answer: "Bees pollinating flowers while gathering nectar" (both benefit)
Comparing and Contrasting
Finding Similarities
Question format:
"Both the first and second paragraphs discuss:"
"The author uses both X and Y as examples of:"
How to answer:
- Read both sections
- Identify shared elements
- Choose answer present in BOTH
Finding Differences
Question format:
"Unlike X, Y is characterized by:"
"The author's tone in discussing X differs from the tone in discussing Y in that:"
How to answer:
- Identify characteristic of X
- Identify characteristic of Y
- Find the contrast
- Choose answer showing difference
Analyzing Multiple Perspectives
Identifying Different Viewpoints
Some passages present multiple perspectives:
- Historical debates
- Scientific theories
- Different interpretations
- Contrasting experiences
Question format:
"According to Scientist 1, the cause of X is:"
"Unlike Scientist 1, Scientist 2 believes that:"
How to answer:
- Locate each perspective
- Note key differences
- Keep perspectives separate (don't mix them up!)
Comparing Perspectives
Question format:
"Scientists 1 and 2 would likely agree that:"
"The main point of disagreement between X and Y concerns:"
How to answer:
- For agreement: Find common ground
- For disagreement: Identify key conflict
Understanding Implications
Predicting Outcomes
Question format: "Based on the passage, if X occurred, what would likely happen?"
How to answer:
- Find passage discussion of X or related concepts
- Identify established patterns/relationships
- Apply that pattern to new scenario
- Choose logical outcome
Example:
Passage explains: More exercise → increased muscle mass → higher metabolism
Question: "Based on the passage, a person who exercises more would likely:"
Answer: "have a higher metabolism"
Understanding Significance
Question format: "The author's discussion of X is significant because it:"
How to answer:
- Find where X is discussed
- Ask: Why did author include this?
- Consider how it relates to main idea
- Choose answer showing its importance
Common Integration Patterns
Pattern 1: Part-to-Whole
Connect specific detail to broader concept
"The example of X (lines 23-28) primarily serves to illustrate:"
Pattern 2: Cause-to-Effect
Link cause mentioned early to effect described later
"The outcome described in paragraph 4 resulted from the action mentioned in:"
Pattern 3: Question-to-Answer
Connect problem posed early with solution given later
"The solution proposed in the final paragraph addresses the problem raised in:"
Pattern 4: Claim-to-Evidence
Link assertion to supporting facts
"Which of the following provides support for the claim in line 12?"
Strategies for Success
Strategy 1: Map the Passage
As you read, note:
- Main idea of each paragraph
- Key transitions
- Where important concepts appear
- Relationships between sections
Mental map helps you:
- Quickly find information
- See connections
- Answer synthesis questions
Strategy 2: Look for Connections
Watch for:
- Repeated words/concepts
- Cause-effect relationships
- Comparisons and contrasts
- Examples and evidence
These signal important connections!
Strategy 3: Use Process of Elimination
For integration questions:
- Check if answer is supported (eliminate if not)
- Check if answer connects relevant parts (eliminate if it brings in wrong section)
- Check if connection makes sense (eliminate if illogical)
- Choose best remaining answer
Strategy 4: Verify with Text
Don't rely on memory!
For every integration question:
- Go back to relevant sections
- Verify each part of answer
- Make sure connection is actually in passage
Common Mistakes
❌ Answering from only one section
Integration questions require combining information
❌ Making unsupported inferences
Must have clear passage evidence
❌ Confusing correlation with causation
X and Y happening together ≠ X causes Y
❌ Choosing answer with familiar passage words
ACT loves to trick with answers that sound familiar but don't actually integrate correctly
❌ Not checking both/all parts
If question asks about "both X and Y," answer must apply to BOTH
Quick Tips
✓ Create passage map — note main idea of each section
✓ Look for transitions — signal important connections
✓ Verify all parts — integration answers must connect multiple pieces
✓ Watch for "both" and "all" — every element must fit
✓ Check each perspective — don't mix up different viewpoints
✓ Find common ground — what do sections share?
✓ Identify differences — how do sections contrast?
✓ Use line references — they point you to what to connect
Practice Approach
For Integration questions:
-
Identify what needs integrating
- Two paragraphs?
- Multiple examples?
- Different perspectives?
-
Locate all relevant sections
- Use line numbers
- Check passage map
-
Read each section
- What does each say?
- How are they related?
-
Identify the connection
- Similar? Different?
- Cause-effect?
- Example-concept?
-
Choose answer that reflects integration
- Must combine information
- Must be supported by ALL relevant parts
Remember: Integration questions test higher-level reading skills. You're not just finding facts — you're connecting ideas, synthesizing information, and seeing the big picture. Take time to understand relationships between different parts of the passage!
📚 Practice Problems
1Problem 1easy
❓ Question:
Two passages discuss renewable energy:
Passage A argues that solar power is the most cost-effective renewable option. Passage B argues that wind power produces more energy per dollar invested.
What do both passages agree on?
A) Solar power is superior to wind power B) Wind power is the best option C) Renewable energy is worth investing in D) Traditional energy sources are better E) Energy costs don't matter
💡 Show Solution
Finding common ground between different viewpoints.
Passage A: Solar power is most cost-effective Passage B: Wind power produces more per dollar
Step 1: Identify what they disagree about • Which renewable source is better (solar vs. wind) • Metric for evaluation (cost-effectiveness vs. energy production)
Step 2: Identify underlying agreement Both passages: • Discuss renewable energy positively • Evaluate economic benefits • Assume renewables are valuable options
They disagree on WHICH renewable, but agree renewables are good!
Step 3: Evaluate options
A) "Solar power is superior" • Only Passage A claims this ✗ • Not shared view ✗
B) "Wind power is the best option" • Only Passage B claims this ✗ • Not shared view ✗
C) "Renewable energy is worth investing in" • Passage A invests in solar (renewable) ✓ • Passage B invests in wind (renewable) ✓ • Both support renewable investment ✓ CORRECT!
D) "Traditional energy sources are better" • Contradicts both passages ✗
E) "Energy costs don't matter" • Both discuss cost/dollars ✗ • Both care about economics ✗
Answer: C) Renewable energy is worth investing in
Finding agreement in disagreement: • Look at the underlying assumption • Identify the broader category they share • Distinguish specific claims from general principles
Venn diagram: Passage A only: "Solar is best" Both agree: "Renewables are valuable" Passage B only: "Wind is best"
2Problem 2medium
❓ Question:
A passage discusses the benefits of exercise, citing studies from 2010, 2015, and 2020. A graph shows that participation in regular exercise increased from 40% to 65% during this same period.
How does the graph relate to the passage?
F) It contradicts the passage G) It provides visual evidence supporting trends discussed in the passage H) It shows exercise decreased over time J) It is unrelated to the passage K) It proves exercise is harmful
💡 Show Solution
Integrating information from text and graphics.
Passage: Discusses benefits of exercise (2010-2020) Graph: Shows exercise participation increased 40% → 65% (2010-2020)
Step 1: Identify the relationship Same time period: 2010-2020 ✓ Related topic: exercise ✓ Trend: increasing participation ✓
Step 2: Analyze how they work together
Passage: Studies show benefits Graph: More people exercising
Logical connection: If studies show benefits → people learn about benefits → more people exercise
The graph SUPPORTS the passage by showing the impact!
Step 3: Evaluate options
F) "Contradicts the passage" • Both show positive view of exercise ✗ • No contradiction ✗
G) "Provides visual evidence supporting trends discussed in passage" • Same time period ✓ • Related topic ✓ • Shows increasing trend matching positive discussion ✓ • Graph adds data to support passage ✓ CORRECT!
H) "Shows exercise decreased" • 40% → 65% is an INCREASE ✗ • Misreads graph ✗
J) "Unrelated to passage" • Same topic and time period ✗ • Clearly related ✗
K) "Proves exercise is harmful" • Absurd - shows increase, passage discusses benefits ✗
Answer: G) It provides visual evidence supporting trends discussed in the passage
Integrating text and graphics: • Check if time periods match • Verify topics align • Determine if they support, contradict, or add to each other • Graphics often provide data/evidence for text claims
Text + Graph relationship types:
- Support: Graph provides evidence for text claims
- Expand: Graph adds new related information
- Contradict: Graph shows opposite trend (rare)
- Illustrate: Graph visualizes what text describes
3Problem 3hard
❓ Question:
Three sources discuss climate change:
Source 1 (2015 study): Projects 2°C temperature increase by 2100 Source 2 (2018 study): Projects 2.5°C temperature increase by 2100 Source 3 (2022 study): Projects 3°C temperature increase by 2100
What pattern emerges when comparing these sources chronologically?
A) Predictions have remained constant B) Newer studies project greater temperature increases C) Older studies were more accurate D) Temperature predictions are decreasing E) All studies disagree completely
💡 Show Solution
Synthesizing information across multiple sources to identify patterns.
Data: • 2015: 2°C by 2100 • 2018: 2.5°C by 2100 • 2022: 3°C by 2100
Step 1: Organize chronologically (already done) 2015 → 2018 → 2022
Step 2: Look for patterns in predictions 2°C → 2.5°C → 3°C
Trend: INCREASING predictions over time!
Step 3: Interpret the pattern Newer studies = higher temperature predictions
Why might this happen? • More data available over time • Better models • Current trends worse than expected • Tipping points discovered
Step 4: Evaluate options
A) "Predictions remained constant" • 2°C ≠ 2.5°C ≠ 3°C ✗ • Clear change over time ✗
B) "Newer studies project greater temperature increases" • 2015 (oldest): 2°C (lowest) • 2022 (newest): 3°C (highest) ✓ • Clear upward trend ✓ CORRECT!
C) "Older studies were more accurate" • Can't determine accuracy until 2100 ✗ • No evidence for this claim ✗
D) "Temperature predictions are decreasing" • Opposite of the trend ✗ • Predictions are INCREASING ✗
E) "All studies disagree completely" • Too extreme - all predict warming ✓ • They're in same range (2-3°C) ✓ • They agree on direction, differ on magnitude ✗
Answer: B) Newer studies project greater temperature increases
Synthesis across sources: • Arrange chronologically when dates given • Look for trends over time • Identify agreements and disagreements • Consider why differences might exist • Don't assume newer = more accurate (need evidence)
Pattern recognition: Time ↑ → Prediction ↑ 2015 → 2018 → 2022 2°C → 2.5°C → 3°C
This shows projections worsening over time (possibly as more data becomes available).
Practice with Flashcards
Review key concepts with our flashcard system
Browse All Topics
Explore other calculus topics